Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 10:24

Just in the last 5 years:
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
News & Notes: John Harbaugh on Why Jon Gruden Observed OTAs - Baltimore Ravens
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Athletics' Denzel Clarke leaps over wall to rob Angels' HR for incredible catch - ESPN
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
What’s next?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
What's the biggest myth about illegal immigrants?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Thank you.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Liberals, why don't you like Conservatives?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Reds star Elly De La Cruz homers after learning of the death of his sister - AP News
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Angelina Jolie And Brad Pitt’s Daughter Shiloh Reintroduces Herself With New Name - HuffPost
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.